Smiles after heated discussions: A scene from Canada ahead of the election

Dr. Alaa Al Tamimi

Friday 18April 2025

Welcome. As I promised, we will meet every Friday to discuss some of the matters that concern many of us. I am happy to receive suggestions for any topic you wish to address.

Yesterday, I watched the debate between the leaders of the Canadian parties. The scene was like a fierce chess match, in which controversy mixed with a smile and criticism with a handshake. They argue fervently in front of the cameras, and then, as soon as the lights go out, they exchange greetings and smiles as if nothing had happened.

Elections are approaching, and Canadians will head to the polls in 10 days. Political campaigns are in full swing. The economy, housing, climate change, and even relations with the United States have been key issues, but most importantly, it is felt that this democracy is still trying to preserve some sophistication, even amid disagreements.

This year's election race is between four major parties, each with a different vision for Canada's future:

The Liberal Party, led by Mark Carney, seeks to pursue liberal reform policies, focusing on the balance between economics and social justice. Carney, who comes from an international banking background, is a quiet leader who knows how to manage.

The Conservative Party, led by Pierre Poiliver, is focused on the economy, cutting taxes, and stopping "excessive liberal spending." His speech is aimed at the middle class and small business owners, sometimes with a populist tone.

The New Democratic Party (NDP), led by Jagmeet Singh, represents the progressive left. It demands expanded health care, higher taxes on the wealthy, and climate and social justice.

The Bloc Québécois, led by Yves-François Blanchet, focuses on the rights of the inhabitants of the province of Quebec and the promotion of its own identity. It does not seek independence but places French cultural specificity at the center of every political debate.

Between seriousness and diplomacy

I was struck by the contrast between body language and speech language: They speak fiercely but without hatred. They disagree, obviously, but they don't forget to smile at each other in conclusion—a rare sight at a time when many values ravage politics.

Perhaps this is one of Canada's messages to the world and young people: that difference does not mean hostility and that politics can be a space for discussion, not an arena for conflict.

The most beautiful thing is that the people here may choose. I come from a world where we often know the winner's name before the ballots are printed, so I watched the debate with curiosity and a sense of nostalgia for what politics should ideally resemble—where intentions are clearly articulated and reason is given the respect it deserves. As we approach voting day, the most pressing question lingers: Who will ultimately gain the trust of the people?